The Calamity Of Dr. Zakir Naik Upon Ummah


pakkkkka zakir

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”A person must possess sound general fundamental principles (from the Qur’an and Sunnah) to which he refers the subsidiary issues of the religion, in order that he may speak with knowledge and justice. After this, he has to know how the subsidiary issues of the religion are (established from those general fundamental principles of the religion), and if not, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the subsidiary issues and upon ignorance and oppression in the general fundamental principles, thus giving birth to great corruption.’’ [Minhaajus Sunnah: 5/83]

———————————————–

1. Zakir Naik Says : I can list 1000 things that Allah cannot do.. Nazubillah And Also He said  There is no where in the Quran where Allah says Allah can do every thing…

Daleelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3oKGnCVj_s

Our Answer :There is a difference between “cannot do” and “will not do”

Dr zakir said Cannot do which means Allah is not capable. If you believe that Allah is capable to do then Dr zakir should have used “Will not do” and then he also changed the meaning of ayah ” Wallahu alaa quli shai’in qadeer.

->> There are many things which Allah doesn’t. for example he doesn’t manifest himself as human being as you said.

We made clear that He Almighty is not “unable” of anything.

we contradict with you because of this “cannot” word which means “unable”, not with “doing” or “not doing”.

we both agree that He Almighty “doesn’t do” many things but the point is that Does Allah Almighty have the power to “do” them?

So, you tell me you too think that He Almighty is unable to do anything????

it is a clear mistake and this person is a “Mulhid” according to the scholars

Daleelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w5YYde7tBY


2 . Zakir Naik Says : There are 0.00001 bleak chances for the one who doesn’t believe in Muhammad (sallallahualihiwasallam) but believes in Allah will to go to Jannah…

Daleel : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3xlo7Y3IC8

Our Answer : Nauzubillah now what i have to reply

i dont know which Aqeeda book he studied. even if you ask  A school Madrasa boy will say there is 100 % no chances if he dosent belive muhammed (s.a.w ) and belive in Allah will go jannah..

This Maslah Our Sheikh. Abu Zaid Zameer Refuted Zakir naik see this Videio :Agar hum Nabi ko nahi mante tu kya hum Jannat mein ja sakte hai | Abu Zaid Zameer

Link : Naseehat to Dr. Zakir Naik || By Shaykh. Abu Zaid Zameer { Part 1 }

Watch Here Also : 


3. Zaakir Naik equates Names of Allah to the names of dieties found in  hindu religious books & Zakir Naik says its is permissible to call  Allah by names of these Hindu Mushrikeen idols.

Daleel : Starts from 20th Minute Link https://youtu.be/ROhEs09ifE0

Zakir Naik says its is permissible to call

Allah by names of these Hindu Mushrikeen idols. 8.”?.the other veda is the atharva ved ?its mentioned in atharva ved book no. 20 chapter no. 58 verse no.3 it says ?dev mahaosi?god is verily great ..same as Allahu Akbar?.allah Is great Amongst all the Vedas the most sacred and the oldest is the Rig ved ?its mentioned in Rig ved book no. 1 hymn no.164 verse no.46 ..sages call one god by many name ?that means there are various names given to this one god and the Rig ved alone gives no less than 33 different attributes to Almighty God most of which are mentioned in Rig Ved book no.2 hymn no.1? and one of the beautiful attribute which is mentioned in Rig ved of Almighty God is Brahma which mentioned in Rig ved book no.2 hymn no.1 verse no.3? Brahma means the creator if you translate into Arabic it means Khalique ?..we muslims have got no objection if anyone calls Almighty god? Allah subhanwatala as Khalique , or creator or Brahma? but if someone says that Brahma is Almighty god who has got four heads and on each head is a crown and he has got four arms we muslims take strong objection to it moreover it is even prohibited in Yajur ved chapter no.32 verse no.3 which says ..na tasya pratima asti ….there is no image of him?another beautiful attribute which is given in the Rig Ved book no.2. hymn no.1 verse no.3 is Vishnu , Vishnu means the sustainer..if you translate into Arabic it means Rab?we muslims have got no objection if someone calls Almighty God as Rab or cherisher sustainer or Vishnu but if someone says Vishnu is almighty god who has got four hands and one his right hand holds the charka that’s the discus and one of his left hand holds the counch and he is riding on a bird or reclining on a couch of snakes we muslims take strong objection to it ?you are going against Yahur ved chapter no.40 verse no.8 which says ?.god is bodyless??as well as upaishad chapter no.4 verse no.19 of swetha swatara upanishad which say s? na tasya pratima asti..there is no likness?. Its mentioned in Rig Ved book no.8 hymn no.1 verse no.1 maa chidanyadi shansada ..that means ?do not worship anyone besides him alone?praise him alone? its mentioned in rig ved book no.5 chapter no.81 verse no.1 it says?verily great is the glory of the divine creator same as surah fatihah chapter no.1 verse no.2 ? Alhamdulillahi rabbil aalameen.. praise be to Allah subhanwatala the Lord of the Worlds ?.its futher mentioned in Rig Ved book no.3. hymn no.34 verse no.1?says? he is the bouteous giver?.its futher mentioned in the yajur ved chapter no.40 verse no. 16 it says ?that lead us to the good path and save us from the sin which makes us wander and go astray ?.similar to the verse of holy quraan of surah fathiha chapter no.1 verse no. 6 and 7 which says ?ihdina siraatal mustaqeem siraatalzeena ???..show us the straight path the path???..its mentioned in rig ved book no.6 hymn no.45 verse no.16 ?ya ek et mushtihi ?.. praise him who is matchless and alone??

Daleeel–>> (Concept of God in Major religions- from the CD-“Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions ?Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions)

Comment Yaha Gaour Farmaye —>> Brahma means the creator if you translate into Arabic it means Khalique ?..we muslims have got no objection if anyone calls Almighty god? Allah subhanwatala as Khalique , or creator or Brahma?????

Astagfirullah

Vishnu means the sustainer..if you translate into Arabic it means Rab?we muslims have got no objection if someone calls Almighty God as Rab or cherisher sustainer or Vishnu…???

Astagfirullah….

Ab A dekho —>> INVESTIGATION INTO THE LITERAL MEANING OF ?BRAHMA? IN SANSKRIT LANGUAGE ACCORDING TO OXFORD SANSKRIT ? ENGLISH DICTIONARY AND OTHER DICTIONARIES

Note:- This investigation is purely directed towards clarifying the meaning of ‘Brahma’ in the Sanskrit-language as opposed to what the hindus regard the diety they worship (‘Brahma’) as. This is to make clear that there is a base and original meaning to this word (‘Brahma’) which is other than what it is commonly used for or understood as by Hindus and others besides them. This will further highlight the ignorance and misguidance being espoused by Mr. Naik.

On Brahma

[literally(means) ‘growth’, ‘expansion’, ‘evolution’, ‘development’, ‘Swelling of spirit or soul’] pious effusion or utterance of the heart in worshipping the gods.The Brahma or one self-existent impersonal spirit, the one universal soul (or one divine essence & source from which all created things emanate or with which they are identified and to which they return).

The self existent, the absolute, the eternal (not generally an object of worship)but rather of mediation and knowledge;

Brahma or the one impersonal universal spirit manifested as a personal creator and as the first of the triad of personal gods

1. Brahma, m. a priest (see asura-, kn-, mata-br0); n. the one self existent spirit, the absolute, R 2. Brahma, in comp. for brahman. – observe that in the following derivatives the nom. m. (Brahma) is used for impersonal spirit and the nom. m. (Brahma) for the personal god.

Oxford Sanskrit-English Dictionary

The Clarendon press

Sir Monier Williams M.A, K.C.I.E Hon. DCL OxON, Hon LLD Calcutta, Hon PH.d GOTTINGEN, Hon Fellow of University College and sometime fellow of Balliol College Oxford

with the collaboration of

Professor E. Leumann PH.d, University of Stausbugg

Professor C. Cappeller PH.d, University of Jena

and other scholars

–>> Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaimeen (rahimahullah) On The Names And Attributes Of Allah Sub’hanahu Wa Ta’ala

Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen (rahimahullah) said:

CHAPTER: The Names of Allah Are Tawqeefiyyah There Is No Place For Intellectual Free-Thinking Regarding Them:

Allah’s Names are tawqeefiyyah, meaning a kind of knowledge that is restricted to textual evidence; there is no place for intellectual free-thinking regarding them. Based upon this, we must suffice ourselves with what is found in the Book and the Sunnah, without adding or taking anything away. This is because the intellect will not be able to grasp the understanding of Allah’s Names that He rightfully deserves, so then we must suffice ourselves with textual evidences only.

This is due to Allah’s statement, “And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.)that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allâh). (Surah Al-Isra Surah 17 Ayah 36).

And He also has said, Say (O Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)): “(But) the things that my Lord has indeed forbidden are AlFawâhish (great evil sins, every kind of unlawful sexual intercourse, etc.) whether committed openly or secetly, sins (of all kinds), unrighteous oppression, joining partners (in worship) with Allâh for which He has given no authority, and saying things about Allâh of which you have no knowledge.” (Surah Al-A’raf , Surah 7 Ayah 33). Furthermore, to ascribe a name to Allah the Exalted that He did not ascribe to His own Self, or to deny something He has named Himself, would be a serious crime against Him. So one must behave in the appropriate manner in this affair and stick to what is found in established textual evidences only.

[Al Qawaa’idul-Muthlaa fee Sifaatillahi wa Asmaa’ihil-Husnaa , Translated into English language by Moosa Richardson; Published by TROID publications Page 30].

Shaikh further stated: CHAPTER: The Kinds Of Deviation From the Correct Belief

[Allah commands us to abandon those who are known for ilhaad,And (all)the Most Beautiful Names belong to Allâh, so call on Him by them, and leave the company of those who belie or deny (or utter impious speech against) His Names. They will be requited for what they used to do. (Surah Al-A’raf , Surah 7 Ayah 180)

Ilhaad with regards to the Names of Allah the Exalted means to stray from the obligatory manner of believing in them, and ilhaad takes many forms:

Point THREE: To ascribe a name to Allah that He did not name Himself with. An example of this is how the Christians call Allah the father, or how the philosophers call Him the root cause of everything (al illatul-Faa’ilah). So since the knowledge of Allah’s Names is tawqeefiyyah, then to ascribe a name to Allah that He did not name Himself with is straying from the obligatory manner of believing in them. Furthermore, these names that have been ascribed to Allah are sheer falsehood that Allah is far removed from….”

Point FOUR: To derive names of idols from the linguistic base of His Names An example of this is what the polytheists did when they derived the name al-‘Uzzaa from al’Azeez, and al-Laat from al-Ilaah, according to one opinion, and they named their idols with these names……. Some kinds of ilhaad may be crimes of shirk or kufr (while others are less than that), depending upon the relative evidences and what they imply.

[Al Qawaa’idul-Muthlaa fee Sifaatillahi wa Asmaa’ihil-Husnaa , Translated into English language by Moosa Richardson; Published by TROID publications Page 37,38].

The Shaikh further states: The Proofs That Establish The Names And Attributes Are Only From The Book And The Sunnah:

The evidences used to establish Allah’s Names and Attributes are found in the Book and the Sunnah, and no Names or Attributes may be established using other than these proofs. So based on this: 1) Whatever Names and Attributes that have been established by the Book and the Sunnah,it is obligatory to affirm them. 2) Whatever has been negated by the Book and the Sunnah, then it is obligatory for us to negate that, while we affirm its opposite as a perfect Attribute. 3) Whatever has not been affirmed nor negated in the Book and the Sunnah, then it isobligatory for us to remain silent about its wording, as it must not be rejected outright simply because of the lack of evidence regarding its affirmation or negation……

[Al Qawaa’idul-Muthlaa fee Sifaatillahi wa Asmaa’ihil-Husnaa , Translated into English language by Moosa Richardson; Published by TROID publications Page 66].

Ibn Uthaimeen (rahimahullah) states in his another excellent work ‘The Explanation of Sufficiency In Creed by Ibn Qudamah’…The Names of Allah are based upon Revelation and as such, their affirmation is dependent upon what is reported in the revealed texts concerning them. Therefore, nothing can be added to them nor subtracted. This is because the intellect is not able to ascertain by itself which names Allah is most deserving of. So it is obligatory to depend upon the revealed texts for determining that. Also, naming Allah with that which He did not name Himself or rejecting what He did name Himself with, is a crime against Him and a perpetration of His right. Thus, abiding by the proper etiquettes with regard to this is obligatory. [Explanation of Sufficiency In Creed, page 19, by Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaimeen (rahimahullah)].

— >> This Masla Sheikh. Abu zaid zameer Refuted Zakir naik . 

you tube link :

And Also Wathc here :Reply to Dr.Zakir naik || By Shaykh. Abu Zaid Zameer { Part 2 }

and aslo watch here : 


4 Dr. Zakir naik said Sikhism is ” “Monotheism Religioun Which Belives IN ONE GOD

yes

Dr. Zakir naik said : Concept of God In Sikhism And the concept of God IN Islam is Almost Similar. As I Told you the 1sr verse Gurugrad saheb volume 1 ; verse 1 . The God Is True he is the creator the unbegotton , free from fear , great . compassionate. “

And Also He said

This is similar the concept of God In Islam of SURAH IKHLAS .Sikhism is ” “Monotheism Religioun Which Belives IN ONE GOD.. And it does not Believe Idol worship and almighty god in the unmanifest form is called ek omkar and in manifest form is called Omkar and guru grant sahib he gave various attributes to this Almighty God ??? Is Same as in Islam ..

Here The Vedio Starts from 3rd Minute

Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc6DfoBTT2s

And Also Zakir naik said : Practice of sikism is diveated and gone in the wrong track that they worship guru grand saheb which was not told by gurunanak

Here The Vedio Starts from Starts from 5;40 Mintes

Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc6DfoBTT2s


Our Answer :  How can he can say Sikhism is Muwahid Religion..?? In Which Basis Dr. Zakir naik said Sikhism is A Muwahid Religion…??   because Gurunanak came after Muhammed s.a.w…??


5 . Zakir Naik  Said  Zorashtrianism is a non semetic , Aryan, non vedic religion, which is not associated with Hinduism and it’s a Prophetic religion

He said  Zorashtrianism is a non semetic , Aryan, non vedic religion, which is not associated with Hinduism and it’s a Prophetic religion, Zorashtrianism is also called as Parsism and it was founded by Prophet Zorashter?..”(Concept of God in Major Religions- from the CD-“Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions ?Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions)

link –>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAo8n__EDRc

–>> Respected Brothers and Sisters ! It seems that brother Zakir has been appointed advocate by the thinktanks of Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism etc. and in his mission to prove them as Religions of Monotheism, he forgot his own usul—-evidence from Quran and Sahih Hadith. Brother Zakir says : “I say,prove to me from Quran and Sunnah , not from logic…….Don’t debate with me. Prove to me from Quran and Sunnah. Immediately Dr Zakir Naik will accept.” Now, my good brother, Would you kindly provide evidence from Quran and Sunnah that “Zoroaster.” is a prophetic religion” and that ‘Zoroaster’ was a ‘Prophet’ ? If you can provide evidence, we’ll also accept it. But , Alhamdulillah! you can’t do it. 

Brothers and Sisters ! Everybody knows, Zoroastrianists are fire-worshippers. Now the question is, how can a Prophet teach his ummah to worship fire? One may argue that Zoroaster did not teach his followers to worship fire but his followers polluted his teachings later on and started to worship fire. This is only the logic of the proponents of Zoroastrianism. No authentic evidence is there in support of this claim. Most importantly, Zoroaster is a man of Pre-Jesus Period. Had he been Prophet, Quran and Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam may have confirmed it. Nor he has been confirmed as Prophet by any Sahabi. So, how can we certify Zoraster to be a Prophet and Zoroastrianism to be a Prophetic Religion?

Brothers and Sisters !. “This (Zakir Naik’s) statement is false. For indeed Zoroastrianism is from the religions of atheism, and the matter of him (Zakir) affirming that this religion is Prophetic and attributing it to a Prophet from the Prophets, this does not prove that it is correct. So let’s assume it as a given that some people attribute that (religion) to a Prophet – according to what they say – then indeed what the Messenger of Allaah came with abrogates all of what the rest of the Prophets came with, regardless of whether those Prophets were ones whose names were known, or those whose names are unknown. Allaah, the Most High, said: “Of some of them We have related to you their story and of some We have not related to you their story.”(Ghaafir:78) And what was sufficient for this man and those like him is the statement of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, “And We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (this Qur’ân) in truth, confirming the Scripture that came before it and Muhayminan (trustworthy in highness and a witness) over it (old Scriptures). So judge between them by what Allâh has revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging away from the truth that has come to you. To each among you, We have prescribed a law and a clear way.” (Al-Maa’idah:48). And the statement of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, “And so judge (you O Muhammad) between them by what Allâh has revealed and follow not their vain desires, but beware of them lest they turn you (O Muhammad) far away from some of that which Allâh has sent down to you. And if they turn away, then know that Allâh’s Will is to punish them for some sins of theirs. And truly, most of men are Fâsiqûn (rebellious and disobedient to Allâh). Do they then seek the judgment of (the Days of) Ignorance? And who is better in judgment than Allâh for a people who have firm Faith.” (Al-Maa’idah:49-50). And it would also have been sufficient for him the statement of Allaah, glory be unto Him the Most High, in His Noble Book, “Then We have put you (O Muhammad) on a plain way of (Our) commandment. So follow that (Islâmic Monotheism and its laws), and follow not the desires of those who know not. Verily, they can avail you nothing against Allâh (if He wants to punish you). Verily, the Dhâlimûn (polytheists, wrong-doers, etc.) are Auliyâ’ (protectors, helpers, etc.) to one another, but Allâh is the Walî (Helper, Protector, etc.) of the Muttaqûn (pious).”(Al-Jaathiyah:18-19)”

.I say “He is a Prophet? And the Prophet called towards the worship of fire?? How can it be possible? What kind of speech is this? Moreover this speech of him went against what he claimed before i.e. all the religions call people towards the worship of one God , therefore this speech is wrong. Rather if he believes that any Prophet from amongst the Prophets called towards the worship of other than Allah سبحانه وتعالى , he will disbelieve/apostate by this speech as it is a speech of Kufr. And his condition is according to this Arabic verse.

فدع عنك كتابك لست منهاولو سودت وجهك بالمداد


6 . Zakir Naik Says : Heaven and hell are for very long periods but not forever…

Daleel : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS8CD4VKWoY

Our Answer : Allah says in Quran 4;57 But those who believe and do righteous deeds – We will admit them to gardens beneath which rivers flow, wherein they abide forever. For them therein are purified spouses, and We will admit them to deepening shade.

“Abadan” means forever. Zakir Naik should stay out of issues he does not know. He is causing a lot of confusion by giving wrong answers.

Shaykh. Abu Zaid  Zameer Refuted This Issue Kya Jannati Jannat mein Hamesha nahi rahenge | Abu Zaid Zameer

Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmNSeaqpwhM


7. Zakir Naik Says We can spiritually be called as ‘Sons of God’…

Daleel : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKE60ZuWGJY

Some of the Follwers of zakir naik Said : He didn’t ask the Muslims to call themselves as sons of God; he was relating to the word ‘son of God’ in the Bible, which was intended to mean ‘servant of God’, since the word son is used to Israel, Solomon, David and others in the bible. According to the Greek expression it meant servant of God. That was to make the christians understand that Jesus is not the literal son of God.Ex: if I address you as brother, you don’t literally become my brother born to common parent. Similarly, he was trying to make the Christians understand this…

Now our Response :

You said “Ex: if I address you as brother, you don’t literally become my brother born to common parent. Similarly, he was trying to make the Christians understand this…”

Is it the same to say ‘I am the brother of Abdullah  and ‘I am the son of God’! Even if not by birth Islamically you’re my Akhifilislam.You said “He didn’t ask the Muslims to call themselves as sons of God” Masha’Allah correct,see thevideo,he said that he doesn’t have a problem if someone calls himself spiritually the son of god.


8 > Zakir Naik congratulates the atheist because he says atheist has said the first part of the shahada Itseems 

Daleel : . “…so normally when an atheist comes and tells me that ?’i do not believe in almighty god …. the first thing i do is i congratulate him…i congratulate the atheist you know why….because he is thinking….the other people …the christian, most of the christians are christian because his father is a christian he is a muslim because his father is a muslim he is a hindu because his father is a hindu they are just following blindly the religion of their fathers , this atheist he is thinking…and what he thinks …that see what is the concept of god told by my father is not right so he doesnt beleive in god almighty and i congratulate him because he has said the first part of the islaamic creed…. the first part of the islaamic shahada Laa ilaaha ..that there is no god ..he has agreed to the first part of the islaamic creed which says laa ilaaha ..there is no god.. now my job is to convince him is on the other part..ilAllah….” (universal brotherhood- ——“Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions ?Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions )ALSO CONGRATULATES THE ATHEIST IN ?IS QURAAN WORD OF GOD.

—————————————————–

9 : Zakir Naik says the word ‘Hur’ has no gender.

Daleel :: – in CD “Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions ?Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions)

———————————————————

10 . Dr.Zakir Naik says the name Ahle Hadeeth is not correct and coins and new name Ahle Saheeh Hadees and says that should be the correct name if at all a name is to be used. he said we should call ourself Only Muslim we should not call ourself ahle hadees & salafi 

Our Response : Just see this videio our Sheikh. Abu Zaid zameer Refuted Zakir naik Lafz Ahlul Hadees ki Zarurat | Abu Zaid Zameer :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJSGcmA1vBQ

and also watch this : Reply to Dr.Zakir naik || By Shaykh. Abu Zaid Zameer { Part 3 }


11 Dr.Naik says Attacks and Makes Mockery of Salafis by claiming sectarianism amongst salafis.

From the Jamiat Ahle hadees conference in Mumbai , India.

SALAFI, how many salafees are there? QUTUBI , SUROOREE , MADHKHALEE, I can take names. And with all of them it is Allah’s fadl that I have met them. Those who are their heads(Sardar log), with all of them I have met; I go to London, America I travel, I go to Saudi Arabia, I go to Gulf Country, how many groups and parties are there in SALAFEES?

Source : Dr. Zakir naik On Sects In Salafis

Our Response : This Is Blent Lie there is no parties in salafies. This Answer replied By our Uthad. Dr. Murtaza Bin Baksh 

Must Listen This Link : Does there exist division in Salafi? By Dr. Murtaza bin Baksh


Must Watch All This Videos :

1. NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh ( Part 1 )

Link : NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh ( Part 1 )

Watch Here Also : 

2. NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh ( Part 2 )

Link : NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh { Part 2}

Watch Here Also : 

3. NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh ( Part 3 )

Link : NASEEHAT to Dr. Zakir naik By || DR.Murtaza Bin Baksh ( Part 3 )

Watch Here Also : 


Allama ibn Baaz Rahimahullah: said

If someone writes something that contradicts the pure Sharee’ah, and distributes that material, or if he propagtes that view in the media, it becomes compulsory to refute him and expose the falsehood of what he says. There is nothing wrong in mentioning that person’s name or in warning people about him if he calls to innovation, shirk, or if he calls people to what Allaah has prohibited or to disobedience. Until this day, there are knowledgeable and believing people from the callers to the truth and bearers of the Sharee’ah fulfilling this obligation, sincerely for Allaah (Subhaanahu wa Ta’aala) and for the benefit of His servants, rebuking the wrong, inviting to the truth, warning others against those who propagate falsehood and destructive rhetoric.

And Allaah is the Expounder of (all) success.

Shaykh Ibn Baaz Rahimahullah.

ڠFataawa Islaamiyyah – Volume 4, P

Dr. Zakir Naik need to go and learn the Deen from the Kibar Scholars of Ahlul Hadees.

May Allaah guide him to the Siraat al-Mustaqeem and rectify his Errors Aameen….!!!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: